我国刑法分则、司法解释中存在大量关于罪后行为对刑事责任减免的规定,现有规定存在如下问题:随意性且减免理由与标准不明确、未遵循同类规则、部分规定背离罪刑法定与罪刑均衡。必须在坚持刑法基本原则和刑法谦抑的前提下,通过对罪后行为的类型划分析,加强规则设置及解释适用中的说理。应对部分现有规定进行重新解释,同时,立法上应做到:在刑法总则中肯定罪后行为对刑事责任的减免、结合犯罪的轻重进行区别化的罪后减免、对因罪后行为避免了严重后果的应明确规定减轻或免除处罚、修正现有的减免幅度过大的部分规定。 There are a lot of provisions on criminal liability relief in the criminal law interpretation in our judicial interpretation. The existing rules have the following problems: the randomness and the reasons and standards of the relief are not clear, the rules of the same kind are not abided by, balanced. Under the premise of upholding the basic principles of criminal law and restraining criminal law, we must strengthen the rules setting and explain the rationale of the application through the analysis of the types of crimes committed. At the same time, we should make a new interpretation of some of the existing provisions. At the same time, we should make the following legislative measures: affirming the deduction of criminal responsibility in the General Provisions of Criminal Law, differentiating post-scriveners in consideration of the severity of the crime, Serious consequences should be clearly defined to reduce or exempt from punishment, to amend some of the provisions of the existing relief too large.