论文部分内容阅读
现代法治社会对案件事实进行精确认定以实现惩罚犯罪和保障无辜这一双重目标的需求,以及出于对事实裁判者的主观规制与提高证明标准可操作适用性之考量,使得第三层次有罪判决证明标准之构建成为迫切必要。现代证明科学的兴起与发展,为构建第三层次的有罪判决证明标准提供了全新的视野与路径。基于证明科学进路,通过探寻并确立庭审证据分析与证据评价之科学有效方法和规则,能够找到满足证据分析与证据评价的科学且精细化之指标,运用这些指标最终能够塑造出第三层次有罪判决证明标准这样一个“动态模具”。该标准在性质上属于或然性标准,具体包含四项科学且精细化的指标。裁判者通过运用有效的方法能够合理判断庭审证明是否符合这四项指标,并据此获得精确且正当可接受的裁判事实。
The need for a modern rule of law society to accurately identify the facts of a case in order to achieve the dual goal of punishing crime and guaranteeing innocentness and considerations of the operational applicability of the subjective rules of factual adjudication and raising the standard of proof make the third level guilty verdict It is imperative to establish the standard of proof. The rise and development of modern proof science has provided a brand new vision and path for establishing the third level proof of guilty verdict. Based on the proof of the scientific approach, scientific and refined indicators that satisfy evidence analysis and evidence evaluation can be found by exploring and establishing scientific and effective methods and rules for court evidence analysis and evidence evaluation. The use of these indicators can finally shape the third level of guilt Judgment criteria such a “dynamic mold ”. The standard is by nature a contingent standard, specifically containing four scientific and refined indicators. By using effective methods, the referees can reasonably judge whether the proof of trial meets the four criteria and accordingly obtain accurate and just facts that are acceptable to the judge.