论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比经阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜下经腹膜外子宫悬吊术对子宫脱垂的治疗效果。方法:选择医院自2013月2月到2014年11月期间收治的子宫脱垂患者69例,将其随机分为观察组35例和对照组34例,观察组实施腹腔镜下经腹膜外子宫悬吊术,对照组应用经阴道子宫切除术治疗。结果:观察组术后性生活满意度为97.1%;对照组性生活满意度为70.6%;同时,观察组手术时间和术中出血量均优于对照组,其各项比较差异均有统计学意义。结论:相较于经阴道子宫切除术,腹腔镜下经腹膜外子宫悬吊术治疗子宫脱垂的临床疗效更佳,。
Objective: To compare the therapeutic effect of transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic extrauterine uterus on uterine prolapse. Methods: A total of 69 patients with uterine prolapse who were admitted to our hospital from February 2013 to November 2014 were randomly divided into observation group (35 cases) and control group (34 cases). The observation group received laparoscopic extrauterine uterus suspension Hang surgery, the control group was treated by transvaginal hysterectomy. Results: The satisfaction rate of postoperative sexual life was 97.1% in the observation group and 70.6% in the control group. Meanwhile, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss in the observation group were better than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant significance. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with transvaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic extrauterine hysterectomy is more effective in treating uterine prolapse.