十七年的文学,以往学术界往往认为有一部分执行了毛泽东文艺思想路线,而另一部分则是违反了毛泽东文艺思想。其实不然,无论是当时受到热烈赞誉的作品,还是受到严厉批判的作品,都没有违反毛泽东文艺思想。因此,十七年的文学,并不是朝着实践或者违反毛泽东文艺思想两个方向发展的,而是朝着毛泽东文艺思想的同一方向行进。当然,这两种作品又呈现出完全不同的面貌,那是因为它们沿着两条不同的主轴线前进:一条是不折不扣地按着毛泽东文艺思想原有的规范进行创作;另一条是沿着毛泽东文艺思想的思路但又并不完全按照规范而是有所拓展地进行创作。这两种作品都对我国文学的发展,做出了突出而独特的贡献。 In the past seventeen years of literature, in the past, academics often thought that part of the implementation of Mao Zedong’s line of thought in literature and art, while others violated Mao Zedong’s thought of literature and art. In actual fact, neither works that were highly acclaimed at the time nor works that were severely criticized did not violate Mao Zedong’s literary and art ideas. Therefore, the seventeen-year literature did not develop in two directions toward practice or violation of Mao Zedong’s literary thought, but proceeded in the same direction toward Mao Zedong’s literary thought. Of course, these two kinds of works present completely different appearances because they follow two different main axes: one is exactly following the original norms of Mao Zedong’s literary thought and the other is Along the line of thought of Mao Zedong’s literary and artistic thought, he did not follow the norm but expanded his work. Both of these works have made outstanding and unique contributions to the development of Chinese literature.