论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察四叶桑菊汤在上呼吸道感染治疗中的应用效果。方法:以2012年2月到2013年1月我院收治的136例呼吸道感染患者为研究对象,随机分为两组,分别进行常规西医合四叶桑菊汤治疗(治疗组)和常规西医治疗(对照组),比较两组疗效及并发症情况。结果:治疗组68例,痊愈34例,显效18例,有效10例,总有效率为91.18%;对照组68例,痊愈14例,显效12例,有效24例,总有效率为73.53%。两组疗效比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组胃肠道反应6例,呼吸困难6例,恶心2例(2.94%),乏力10例;对照组胃肠道反应12例,呼吸困难16例,恶心6例,乏力22例。两组并发症情况比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:四叶桑菊汤在治疗上呼吸道感染方面具有明显优势,安全性高,值得临床推广。
Objective: To observe the effect of four-leaf Sang Ju soup in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection. Methods: One hundred and sixty-six patients with respiratory tract infection admitted to our hospital from February 2012 to January 2013 were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the two groups were treated by conventional western medicine combined with Siye Sang Ju Tang (treatment group) and conventional Western medicine Group). The curative effect and complications of the two groups were compared. Results: In the treatment group, 68 cases were cured, 34 cases were cured, 18 cases were markedly effective and 10 cases were effective. The total effective rate was 91.18%. In the control group, 68 cases were cured, 14 cases were cured, 12 cases were effective and 24 cases were effective. The total effective rate was 73.53%. The efficacy of the two groups, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The treatment group had 6 cases of gastrointestinal reaction, 6 cases of dyspnea, 2 cases of nausea (2.94%) and 10 cases of weakness. The control group had 12 cases of gastrointestinal reaction, 16 cases of dyspnea, 6 cases of nausea and 22 cases of weakness. Comparisons of two groups of complications, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Sesame Sang Ju soup in the treatment of upper respiratory tract infection has obvious advantages, high safety, worthy of clinical promotion.