论文部分内容阅读
本文从道言关系的角度探讨了东西哲学的差异问题 ,作者认为 ,东西哲学的差异 ,实根源于双方对于道言关系之认识不同。内容分四部分 :第一部分讨论两种不同的共相。东西哲学都在共相中探求真理 ,然而双方所探求的共相 ,却是很不同的两种 ,一为现证之共相 ,一为名言之共相。第二部分讨论东西哲学对于道言关系的不同看法。东方哲学认为一切现象的本质是名言 ,而本体则离于言诠 ,即言语道断 ;西方哲学认为真理乃一名言概念的体系 ,即道在言中。第三部分讨论东西哲学探求本体的不同道路。东西哲学由于对道言关系的认识阶段不同 ,从而采取了两条不同的探求本体的道路 ,一为离言现证 ,一为意识思辨。第四部分讨论东西哲学的其它差异
This paper explores the differences between East and West philosophy from the perspective of the relationship between Taoism and Taoism. The author believes that the difference between East and West philosophy is rooted in the different understanding of the relationship between Taoism and Taoism. The content is divided into four parts: The first part discusses two different phases. The philosophies of things and philosophers all seek truth from the common phase. However, the two sides seek the commonality but are two very different ones. They are the commonality of the evidence and the commonality of the famous saying. The second part discusses the different viewpoints of philosophical thought about the relationship between words and words. Oriental philosophy holds that the essence of all phenomena is the famous saying, while the ontology is away from the word-interpretation, that is, the speech is broken. The western philosophy holds that truth is a system of language concepts, that is, lies in words. The third part discusses the different ways of philosophical inquiry into the ontology. Due to the different stages of cognition of the relationship between Taoism and Taoism, the philosophy of things has taken two different paths of exploring the ontology. One is the speech of the excuse and the other is the speculation of consciousness. The fourth part discusses other differences between the philosophy of things