论文部分内容阅读
笔者在本刊2016年11期的《新闻评论中的抽象性因素》一文中曾经写到:评论中需要有抽象思维,以帮助我们超越有局限的具体事物,形成具有普遍性的深刻观点。但是,抽象性思维及其表达所借助的抽象性词语,毕竟会增加阅读理解的负担。从实验可证的规律来看,人们总是对那些具体可感的事物,以及指示这些事物的词语更容易接受;而对那些已经脱离了具体感知层面的抽象事物,以及指示这些事物的词语更难于接受。
In my article, “The Abstraction Factor in News Commentary,” in 2016 issue 11 of the journal, I wrote: “There needs to be abstract thinking in the commentary to help us transcend the limited concrete things to form a profound and profound view.” However, abstract thinking and the abstract words with which it is expressed will, after all, increase the burden of reading comprehension. Judging from the law of experimental evidence, people are always more receptive to those things that are specifically perceptible and those that indicate them. And to those abstract things that have escaped specific perceptions and the words that indicate them Difficult to accept.