论文部分内容阅读
作者通过临床对比试验,对光动力灭活法(Photodynamic inactivation)治疗寻常疣的疗效予以否定。病例与方法:1976～1977年,作者用随机法收集手足寻常疣120例,将其分为两组:1.光动力灭活组:共65例,其中男35例、女30例。手部寻常疣26例,足15例,手足皆有损害24例。1个损害者1例,2～5个损害者21例,超过5个损害者43例。病期1个月至15年,平均28个月。患者平均年龄20岁(10～74岁)。2.对照组:共55例,其中男29例,女26例。手部寻常疣24例,足16例,手足皆有损害15例。1个损害者2例,2～5个损害者17例,超过5个损害者36例。病期1个月至20
The author through the clinical comparative test, photodynamic inactivation (Photodynamic inactivation) treatment of verruca vulgaris to be negated. Cases and Methods: From 1976 to 1977, the authors randomized 120 cases of common warts were collected, divided into two groups: 1. Photodynamic inactivation group: a total of 65 cases, 35 males and 30 females. 26 cases of common hand wart, foot in 15 cases, hand and foot all have damage in 24 cases. 1 case of damage, 21 cases of 2 ~ 5 damage, 43 cases of more than 5 damage. Disease period of 1 month to 15 years, an average of 28 months. The average age of patients was 20 years old (10 to 74 years old). 2. Control group: A total of 55 cases, including 29 males and 26 females. 24 cases of verruca common hand, foot in 16 cases, hand and foot all have damage in 15 cases. 1 case of damage in 2 cases, 2 to 5 cases of damage in 17 cases, more than 5 lesions in 36 cases. Illness from 1 month to 20