论文部分内容阅读
目的观测对比无线镇痛监控系统与传统镇痛方法在晚期癌症患者的镇痛效果。方法郑州大学附属肿瘤医院2013年12月至2014年12月晚期癌症患者70例随机分为治疗组与对照组,分别行无线镇痛监控系统与传统机械镇痛泵进行静脉输注吗啡,观察患者镇痛效果,镇痛满意度,临床疗效,不良反应及生活质量。结果两组患者治疗后疼痛强度比治疗前得到显著提高(P<0.05);治疗组患者的镇痛效果满意度显著高于对照组患者(P<0.05);两组总有效率差异不大,而显效率差异显著(P<0.05);各组患者不良反应发生率差异不显著(P>0.05);治疗组患者镇痛后生活质量先于对照组患者得到改善。结论无线镇痛监控系统比传统镇痛方式显著提高患者镇痛效果并提升患者满意度,在晚期癌症患者镇痛治疗中具有安全有效的临床推广价值。
Objective To compare the analgesic effects of wireless analgesia monitoring system and conventional analgesia in patients with advanced cancer. Methods Seventy patients with advanced cancer from December 2013 to December 2014 in Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. Intravenous morphine infusion was performed with wireless analgesia monitoring system and traditional mechanical analgesia pump respectively. Patients were observed Analgesic effect, analgesic satisfaction, clinical efficacy, adverse reactions and quality of life. Results The pain intensity of the two groups after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment (P <0.05). The satisfaction of the analgesic effect of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P <0.05); the total effective rate was not significant difference between the two groups, (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in each group was not significantly different (P> 0.05). The quality of life of patients in the treatment group was improved before the control group. Conclusion Compared with the traditional methods of analgesia, the wireless analgesia monitoring system can significantly improve the analgesic effect and enhance patient satisfaction. It has a safe and effective clinical promotion value in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer.