论文部分内容阅读
应当将关于讨债信托与诉讼信托无效的规定从我国《信托法》中删除。基本理由:该法关于讨债信托无效的规定的适用将致使已成为政策工具的公司债信托与金融不良债权信托成为无效信托,故该规定在目前已成为“推动公司债券发行”与“剥离国有商业银行金融不良债权”这两项我国现阶段的重要金融改革政策所要达到的目标的法律障碍,甚至关于该规定已成为后面一项政策目标实现的法律障碍已有司法判例佐证;该法关于诉讼信托无效的规定完全没有必要存在于其中,因为在我国并不存在从国家有效规制金钱债权代替行使行为角度看需要该规定的法律背景与社会背景,况且将该规定保留在该法中对债权人明显不利。
The provisions on invalidation of debt collection trusts and litigation trusts should be removed from China’s “Trust Law.” Rationale: The application of the Act’s provisions on the invalidation of debt collection trusts will render the corporate bonds trusts and financial distressed debt trusts that have become policy instruments invalid, so that the provision has now become “to promote the issuance of corporate bonds” Striking off bad financial claims by state-owned commercial banks "These two legal obstacles to achieving the goals of the important financial reform policies at this stage in our country have even been supported by judicial precedents on the legal obstacles to the fulfillment of a policy objective by that provision. There is no need for the law to invalidate the lawsuit trust at all because it does not exist in our country because of the legal background and social background that require the state to effectively regulate money claims instead of exercising it. Obvious to creditors.