论文部分内容阅读
笔者在重新回顾了文学研究史上三个“悬而未决”的研究:形式手段、互文性和文类,并对此提出了更细致的问题,用以揭示我们是否值得投入更大的精力来继续进行这三个发面的研究。他得出结论:对于文学文本的形式手段可以借助于当今的语料库进行更进一步的研究;而对于互文性的研究可以使用更为直接的方法,研究那些明显是重写或引用先前文本的文本或文本碎片;在文类研究中,颇具前途而又为人所称道的是以认知法为基础的文类原型学研究。
The author reviews three “pending” studies in the history of literary studies: formal means, intertextuality and genre, and proposes more detailed questions on whether or not it is worthwhile to devote more energy to continue Conduct research on these three faces. He concludes that the formal approach to literary text can be further studied with the aid of today’s corpora, and that research on intertextuality can use more direct methods to study texts that clearly overwrite or cite previous texts Or text fragments; in the genre research, promising and commendable is based on cognitive genre prototype study.