关于“四大名著是否适合孩子阅读”的争论,最近一直风波不平。有人质疑四大名著对儿童身心会有负面影响:也有人认为“四大名著少儿不宜”的论调限制了孩子的自由阅读,孩子有权选择阅读的书籍。这看似是一场观点博弈,其实是出于自己的喜好而自说自话,因为这些争执并没有真正考虑孩子是否愿意读四大名著。当然,高中生驳斥北大教授的这篇文章,很大程度上也只是一家之言。可问题的关键在于,在以往的争论中,我们看到的是一些专家 The controversy over whether or not the four masterpieces are suitable for kids to read has been rife recently. Some people have questioned the four famous works of children will have a negative impact on body and mind: Some people think that “the four famous children should not be” argument limits the children’s free reading, children have the right to choose to read the book. This seemingly is a game of opinion, in fact, out of their own preferences and because they do not really consider whether the child is willing to read the four famous. Of course, high school students refute this article by Professor Peking University, to a large extent, it is only one statement. The crux of the problem is that in the past debates, we saw some experts