《美国法典》第28章第1782条规定,美国法院在特定情况将协助外国或者国际裁决机构在美国境内获取证据。联邦最高法院审理英特尔案对该条款的解读具有重要意义,同时仲裁庭是否适用第1782条,在联邦地区法院也产生分歧。通过对美国近十年的经典案例进行分类整理,了解第1782条的适用情况,指导我国与美国司法协助合作。对照我国《仲裁法》、《民事诉讼法》,对我国相关司法协助制度以及替代性救济进行反思。 Section 1782 of Title 28 of the U.S. Code states that U.S. courts will assist foreign or international adjudication agencies to obtain evidence in the United States in certain circumstances. The interpretation of the clause by the Supreme Court of Justice in the Intel case is of great importance, and the applicability of Article 1782 by the arbitration tribunal also disagreed in the Federal District Court. Through the classification of the classic cases of the United States for ten years to understand the application of Article 1782 and guide our cooperation with the United States on judicial assistance. In contrast with China’s “Arbitration Law” and “Civil Procedure Law,” it conducts an introspection on the relevant judicial assistance system and alternative remedies in our country.