论文部分内容阅读
在“大力推进生态文明建设并将之放在突出地位”的历史新阶段,我国不同地区的生态文明建设进程究竟如何以及是否存在显著的区域差异?本文运用AHP分析法,构建了一个包容多属性指标的生态文明度综合评价模型,进而具体测算了2011年全国31个省区生态文明度的数值变化及其区域特征,研究表明:2011年我国大多数省区的生态文明度处于中级或中低级建设阶段,生态文明度均值约0.442(即“不及格”水平);区域经济发展水平与生态文明度之间并不一致但关联密切,两者之间并不存在理论上的内在冲突,关键在于经济发展的方式与路径;2007-2011年间我国东中西部地区的生态文明度指数呈现不同程度的稳步上升趋势且存在“西部>中部>东部”的动态特征。针对我国生态文明度总体建设水平较低以及区域不平衡的状况,本文最后提出了加快生态文明法制、体制和机制创新等若干政策建议。
In the new historical stage of “promoting the construction of ecological civilization and putting it in prominence”, what is the process of ecological civilization construction in different regions of our country and whether there is any significant regional difference? This paper uses AHP analysis to construct an inclusive Multi-attribute index ecological civilization degree comprehensive evaluation model, and then the specific calculation of the 2011 31 provinces and autonomous regions in the value of ecological civilization changes and regional characteristics, the study shows that: in 2011 most of our province’s ecological civilization degree in the intermediate or In the middle and low-level construction stage, the mean value of ecological civilization is about 0.442 (ie, the level of “failing”); the level of regional economic development is not consistent with the level of ecological civilization but closely linked, and there is no theoretical conflict between the two , The key lies in the ways and paths of economic development. From 2007 to 2011, the index of ecological civilization in the eastern, central and western regions of China showed a steady upward trend to varying degrees and there was a dynamic characteristic of “western> central> eastern ”. In view of the low overall level of ecological civilization in our country and the regional imbalance, the paper finally put forward some policy suggestions to speed up the legal system, institutional and mechanism innovation of ecological civilization.