论文部分内容阅读
尧舜禅让与篡夺的问题是一个重要的历史问题,自王玉哲先生在《历史教学》1986年1期发表了题为《尧、舜、禹“禅让”与“篡夺”两种传说并存的新理解》的文章后,在学术界引起了较大的注意.万九河先生最近在《天津师大学报》1987年4期上发表了《怎样看尧舜禅让与篡夺的关系》一文,也对这个问题进行了论述。《王文》中认为,历史上“禅让”和“篡夺”两种截然相反的传说史料价值是相同的、都含有
Since the issue of Yao and Shun zoning and usurping is an important historical issue, since Mr. Wang Yuzhe published a new understanding of coexistence of the two legends “Yao, Shun and Yu” and “Usurpation” in “History Teaching” The article attracted a great deal of attention in academia.Wanjiu He recently published a paper entitled “How to Look at the Relationship between Yao and Shun Chan and Usurpation” in 1987, “Tianjin Normal University Journal” The discussion. In “Wang Wen”, it is considered that the historic values of the two diametrically opposed legends of “Zen Buddhism” and “Usurpation” are the same, all contain