论文部分内容阅读
以危险方法危害公共安全罪“侵入”食品安全领域犯罪,使得该罪名的口袋效应进一步扩大,在“其他危险方法”的理解、刑法解释的方法以及刑法与刑事政策的关系等方面均值得反思。“其他危险方法”在特性上应该具有及时性和直接性,程度上应该与放火、爆炸等具有相当程度的危害后果,具有难以控制性和恐怖性;在刑法解释边界上,需合理处理形式解释与实质解释的关系;在司法层面应该坚守“刑法是刑事政策不可逾越的屏障”。河南“瘦肉精”案定性为以危险方法危害公共安全罪并不妥当,应该认定为生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪的共犯。
To endanger public safety crimes by means of dangerous methods and to “invade” the crimes in the field of food safety so as to further expand the pocketed effect of such charges in the understanding of “other dangerous methods”, the methods of criminal law interpretation and the relationship between criminal law and criminal policies Worth to reflect. “Other dangerous methods ” should have the characteristics of timeliness and immediacy, to the extent should be associated with arson, explosions, etc. have a considerable degree of harmful consequences, with uncontrollable and terrible; in the interpretation of the boundary of criminal law, to be handled rationally The relationship between formal explanation and substantive explanation; at the judicial level, “criminal law is an insurmountable barrier to criminal policy” should be adhered to. Henan “lean meat ” case of the nature of dangerous ways to endanger public safety crime is not proper, should be identified as the production and sale of toxic and harmful food accomplice.