论文部分内容阅读
在我国社会转型时期,由于《行政诉讼法》等成文法内在的局限性,则会使一些法律没有明示予以保护的合法权益被排斥于司法救济之外,出现行政诉讼中的司法救济真空。这将导致在某些行政诉讼中,两个法院“踢皮球”现象的存在,使广大人民群众对作为社会最后救济权利和公平正义象征的司法权失去信任。弥补这些行政诉讼中出现的空白,完善立法,加强立法解释,可以使一些在行政系统内部反复申诉的行政上诉案件进入法院的大门,大大提高政府机关及其工作人员的行政质量,对于增强广大人民群众对政府的信任,促进行政诉讼的健康发展有重要意义。
In the period of social transformation in our country, due to the inherent limitations of the statute law such as the Administrative Procedure Law, the legal rights and interests not expressly protected by some laws are excluded from the judicial remedies and the vacuum of judicial relief in administrative proceedings appears. This will lead to the existence of the “trial of the ball” phenomenon in some administrative proceedings and the loss of trust in the judicial power of the general public as the symbol of the ultimate remedy and fairness and justice of society. To make up for these gaps in administrative litigation, to improve legislation and to strengthen legislative interpretation, some of the administrative appeals brought by repeated appeals within the administrative system can be brought to the front of the courtroom to greatly improve the administrative quality of government agencies and their staff, It is of great significance for the masses to trust the government and promote the healthy development of administrative litigation.