论文部分内容阅读
2015年3月11日,北京知識產權法院對“微信”商標案件進行了公開開庭審理,並進行了網絡直播。法院當庭對案件進行了宣判,認為商標評審委員會認定被異議商標(以下簡稱:“微信”商標)的申請註冊構成《商標法》第十條第一款第(八)項所禁止的情形並無不當,維持商標評審委員會作出的裁定,“微信”商標不予核准註冊。鑒於知識產權法院的承辦法官已經在網絡上公開了一審判決書的部分內容,也公開了其審理案件的基本思路,加之網絡直播讓公衆更多地瞭解到案件的審理過程和各方激辯的觀
On March 11, 2015, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court held a public hearing on the trademark “WeChat” and conducted a live webcast. The court sentenced the case in court, holding that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board found that the application for registration of an opposition trademark (hereinafter referred to as “WeChat”) is prohibited under Article 8 (1) (a) of Article 10 of the Trademark Law The situation is not improper, to maintain the ruling of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, “WeChat ” trademark will not be approved for registration. In view of the fact that the contracting judge of the intellectual property court has disclosed part of the verdict of the first instance on the Internet and has also disclosed the basic idea of hearing the case and the webcast has made the public know more about the trial process of the case and the arguments of all parties