现在有一种说法,“企业承包,实行自主经营后,容易产生急功近利的短期行为。”我认为这种说法是缺乏科学分析的。因短期行为与“承包制”并没有必然的内地联系。但当前承包中的短期行为确实存在。几乎成了承包经营中的共病,应如何看待呢? 企业行为是长期的,还是短期的?不在于是否实行了“承包制”,关键地承包方法是否对头,政策是否正确稳定,责权利是否统一,分配制度是否合理等。一般说来,企业承包后承包期长自主权越充分,自负盈亏程度越高,短期行为就会越少,直至杜绝。相反企业越缺乏经营自主权,吃“大锅饭”, Now there is a saying: “After contracting a company and implementing self-management, it is easy to produce short-term behaviors that are quick to gain instant benefits.” I think this argument lacks scientific analysis. Because of the short-term behavior and the “contract system” there is no inevitable link between the mainland. However, the short-term behavior in current contracting does exist. Almost a comorbidity in contracted management, how should we treat it? Is the corporate behavior long-term or short-term? It does not depend on the implementation of the “contracting system”. The key is whether the contracting method is correct, whether the policy is correct and stable, and whether the rights and responsibilities are Uniformity, whether the distribution system is reasonable and so on. In general, the more fully the autonomy of enterprises after contracting, the higher the degree of self-financing, the less short-term behavior will be eliminated. On the contrary, the more companies lack the right to operate and eat “big pots,”