论文部分内容阅读
在人文科学与社会科学的说理活动中,人们往往就概念的正确用法争论不休,并一直试图通过赋予概念以单一固定之意义来解决纷争。事实上,有些概念也许本质上就是有争议的。这样一些概念符合一些基本的限定条件。本质上就具有争议性,这一点正是这些概念得以持续使用的生命力所在。当然,争议性并不意味着含混不清,“正确的”用法就在实际使用中。因此就不应当像理解自然科学概念一样,为其寻求某一种“正确用法”来解决纷争,而应当通过描绘这些评价性概念的历史来加深对这种概念的理解。哲学反思有助于我们对于这样的概念做出“理性”的思考。
In the reasoning activities of the humanities and social sciences, people often argue over the correct usage of concepts and try to solve the disputes by giving them the concept of a single fixation. In fact, some concepts may be controversial in nature. Such concepts meet some basic qualifications. In essence, it is controversial, and this is where the concept of sustainable use of life lies. Of course, controversy does not mean ambiguity, “correct ” usage is in actual use. Therefore, the concept of “correct usage” should not be used to solve disputes, as it is to understand the concept of natural science. Rather, the understanding of such concepts should be deepened by depicting the history of these evaluative concepts. Philosophical reflection helps us to think “rational” about such concepts.