文章综合分析了冯友兰在各个时期的理论 ,对其新理学的内容进行了新的界定 ,并对这一哲学体系进行了一些新的论证。对廖平之学做了初步介绍 ,提醒人们冯友兰在《中国哲学史》上册和下册中某些观点的不同 ,冯友兰其实是以廖平之学而非康有为之学做为“经学时代”下限的。文章还尝试对冯友兰建国以后复杂混乱甚至自相矛盾的哲学思想进行初步的分析、说明 The article comprehensively analyzes Feng Youlan’s theories in different periods and makes a new definition of the content of his neo-Confucianism, and makes some new arguments about this philosophical system. Liao Pingzhi made a preliminary introduction to the school to remind people Feng Youlan in the “History of Chinese Philosophy,” Volumes and the second part of some of the different perspectives, Feng Youlan actually Liao Ping school rather than Kang Youwei as “the era of classics,” the lower limit. The article also attempts to carry on the preliminary analysis to Feng Youlan’s complex chaos after the founding of the PRC even contradictory philosophical thought, explains