论文部分内容阅读
目的：探究慢性宫颈炎患者通过微波治疗仪治疗后取得的临床成效。方法：选取我院2015年1月-2016年6月入院的慢性宫颈炎患者80例，通过随机分组法分为观察组和对照组，每一组40人。对照组治疗方法为激光治疗，观察组为微波治疗仪治疗。针对临床治疗有效率、不良反应发生情况，对两组患者进行对比分析。结果：在临床治疗效果方面，观察组治疗总有效率（95%）比对照组总有效率（75%）高（P<0.05）；在糜烂消失时间方面，观察组消失时间为（6.12±1.35）d，对照组消失时间为（13.24±2.46）d，观察组明显低于对照组，具有一定统计学意义（P<0.05）；针对不良反应发生情况，观察组发生率（7.5%）显著低于对照组发生率（25%），（P<0.05）；观察组满意度（100%）显著高于对照组（80%），（P<0.05）。结论：慢性宫颈炎患者通过微波治疗仪治疗后取得的临床成效显著，在提高治疗效果和满意度的同时，使不良反应发生率明显降低，且缩短糜烂消失时间，应在临床大力推广应用。“,”Objective: To explore the clinical results of patients with chronic cervicitis treated by microwave therapy. Methods: 80 patients with chronic cervicitis admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to June 2016 were randomly dividedinto two groups: observation group and control group. The control group was treated by laser therapy, and the observation group was treated by microwave therapy instrument. According to the effective rate of clinical treatment and the incidence of adversereactions, the two groups of patients were compared and analyzed. Results: The total effective rate (95%) of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (75%) (P <0.05). In the erosive disappearance time, the disappearance time of the observation group was (6.12±1.35 ) Was significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse eventswas significantly lower in the observation group (7.5%) than in the control group (13.24±2.46) (25%)(P <0.05). The satisfaction degree of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (80%) (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of the treatment of chronic cervicitis by microwave therapy instrument is significant. It can decrease the incidence of adverse reactions and shorten the disappearing time of erosions while improving the therapeutic effect and satisfaction. It should be popularized in clinic.