论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼中专门机关为追诉犯罪,解决被追诉人刑事责任所进行的活动为广义的“司法”。近来,我国(狭义)司法实践中兴起了“能动司法”的潮流。梳理古今中外包含“能动司法”因素的实践与学说后,在我国当今司法语境下从程序、证据与实体,法院审级,不同类型的诉讼等角度分层解读。审判阶段能动司法指法官拥有的认定案件事实、适用法律的自由裁量职权和最高人民法院的“司法解释”权限。从认识论、系统论、诉讼法学原理分析其理论基础。并为刑事诉讼中合理地“能动司法”寻找界限。
Specialized agencies in criminal proceedings to prosecute crimes, to solve the criminal responsibility of the respondent to carry out the activities of the generalized “justice.” Recently, the trend of “active judicial” has arisen in our (narrowly defined) judicial practice. After combing the practice and theory of “active judiciary” at all times and in all countries and in the judicial context of our country today, we can interpret it hierarchically from the perspectives of procedure, evidence and entity, court trial, and different types of litigation. Judicial stage refers to the trial stage of the judge that the judge has the facts of the case, the discretionary powers of the applicable law and the Supreme People’s Court “judicial interpretation ” authority. From the epistemology, system theory, procedural jurisprudence analysis of its theoretical basis. And find a reasonable “active judicial” in criminal proceedings.