论文部分内容阅读
针对《论中国封建城市经济发展的总体特点》一文中的某些观点提出几点新的认识 :(1 )无论是中国还是西欧的封建城市都滋生于封建自然经济之上 ,并在一个相当长的历史过程中有着与封建经济结构、政治结构相适应的方面 ,两者在城市基本属性、居民生活方式等方面体现出的差别并不具有本质意义 ;(2 )该文所论“城市不能有效涵容农业人口”、“职业构成简单”等总体特征与中国封建城市呈现出的人口众多、市场繁荣的表象及资本主义萌芽较早出现等历史事实相悖 ;(3)中国封建经济结构是以小农经济为主体的 ,其自给程度相当有限 ,因而商品经济必然较之西欧封建时代具有更大的发展前景 ,这在事实上就为中国封建城市经济提供了更大的发展空间
Aiming at some points of view in the article “The general characteristics of the economic development of feudal cities in China”, I put forward some new ideas: (1) Both feudal cities in China and Western Europe are born on the feudal natural economy, The historical process has the aspect of adapting to the feudal economic structure and political structure, and the differences between the two in the basic attributes of cities and the lifestyles of residents do not have the essential meaning; (2) The article “The city can not be effective (3) The Chinese feudal economic structure is based on the peasant economy (small-peasant economy). The general characteristics of China’s feudal cities such as ”agricultural population with capacity“ and ”occupation composition" are contrary to the historical facts such as the huge population, market prosperity and earlier emergence of capitalism in China’s feudal cities. As the main body, the degree of self-sufficiency is quite limited, so the commodity economy must have a greater development prospect than the feudal era in Western Europe, which in fact provides more room for development for the feudal urban economy in China