在哄动一时的章俊理非法行医一案中① ,一千余名患者在刑事附带民事诉讼中向被告人提出巨额索赔。但是 ,一、二审法院对患者提出的精神损害赔偿和依据《消费者权益保护法》提出的赔偿双倍治疗费的请求都没有支持 ,由此引发了人们对刑事附带民事诉讼中具体法律适用问题的思考 , In the case of unlawful practice by Zhang Junli in a flash, ① more than a thousand patients filed huge claims with the defendant in criminal incidental civil proceedings. However, both the first instance court and the second instance court did not support the patients’ mental damages and the requests for doubling the treatment costs according to the “Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Consumers”, which triggered the issue of the application of specific laws in criminal incidental civil proceedings Thinking ,