论文部分内容阅读
与美国在反倾销中只适用国内法对华采取反倾销措施不同,美国反补贴当局适用国内反补贴法和诉诸WTO争端解决机构两种途径来解决中国的“补贴”问题。美国对华反补贴行动分三步走:第一步,2006年之前的理论酝酿;第二步是适用国内法对我国出口产品发起反补贴调查;第三步将是频繁地诉诸多边机制,即更多地将中美反补贴争端诉诸WTO争端解决机构。
Different from the United States applying only anti-dumping measures to anti-dumping measures against domestic law in China, the U.S. anti-subsidy authorities apply domestic anti-subsidy laws and resort to WTO dispute settlement agencies to solve the “subsidy” issue in China. The U.S. anti-subsidy action against China is divided into three steps: the first step is to brew the theory before 2006; the second step is to apply the domestic law to launch anti-subsidy investigations on China’s export products; the third step is to resort frequently to multilateral mechanisms, That is, more resort to the Sino-US anti-subsidy dispute WTO dispute settlement agencies.