论文部分内容阅读
20世纪80年代以来,随着隋唐碑志的大量发现和出土,以及吐鲁番学研究的升温,学术界开始注意墓志中有关高昌与西州的资料,并做了不少工作,推动了吐鲁番学的发展。该文选取近年新见唐康子相、成公崇墓志,对其中有关高昌与西州的资料进行解读,认为:康子相参加过唐贞观十四年讨伐高昌之役,而他所以参加该役,与他原属东突厥系粟特人有关。成公崇曾被制授西州别驾,不久又兼西州都督府别驾,他所以被派往西州供职,与他先世原为金城人,与高昌麴王同乡里,与河西豪右有渊源有关。这些史料说明,有唐一代不管是讨伐高昌,还是治理西州,对于相关人员的选择,都是有条件的。近年新见唐康远、康固父子墓志也能证明这一点。这是研究唐王朝讨伐高昌、治理西州需要特别予以注意的。
Since the 1980s, with the discovery and excavation of the Sui and Tang inscriptions, and the warming of Turfan Studies, academics began to pay attention to the material about Gaochang and Xizhou in the epitaphs and did a lot of work to promote the development of Turfan . This article chooses the newly discovered Tang K’angzi and Chenggongzong epitaphs in recent years, and interprets the relevant data of Gaochang and Xizhou. It is concluded that Kang Zizhao participated in the battle of Gaochang for fourteen years, He originally belonged to the Sogdian of the Eastern Turks. Cheng Chih-sung had been granted a license to drive in Xizhou, and soon he served as a governor of Xizhou. He was therefore sent to work in Xizhou with his predecessor as a native of Jincheng, Paternity related. These historical facts show that there is a condition for the Tang generation, whether it is to crush Gaochang or govern Xizhou, for the choice of relevant personnel. New see Tangkang Yuan in recent years, Kangshe father and son epitaphs can prove this point. This is the study of the Tang Dynasty crusade against Gaochang, Xizhou need special attention.