论文部分内容阅读
计划外黑色、有色金属全国统一最高限价办法出台已有两个月了。这项牵涉面广,出台前有关方面反应就很强烈的整治措施,在执行中已经暴露出越来越多的问题,产生了明显的负效应,出现钢厂不供,物资企业难动,用料企业四处求供的新情况。对于这种情况有些人认为限价违背价值规律,根本就不该限;还有些人认为所以出现这种局面,是因为钢厂有令不行,有禁不止,率先采取种种变通办法绕开限价,影响了整个限价办法的实施,当前首先要严格最高出厂限价的执行。我们认为,这两种认识都有失偏颇,都不能达到治理混乱、稳定物价、保证生产发展的整治预期效果,而应吸取教训,从实际出发,综
It has been two months since the unification of the black and non-ferrous metals nationwide maximum price limit method was introduced. This involves a wide range of issues, the introduction of the rectification measures before the response of the relevant parties is very strong, has revealed more and more problems in the implementation, has produced a significant negative effect, there is no supply of steel plants, material companies hard to use, with The company is looking for new situations everywhere. Some people think that the limit price violates the law of value and should not be limited at all. Some people still think that this situation occurs because the steel mills have orders and prohibitions, and they are the first to take all sorts of workarounds to get around the limit price. This has affected the implementation of the entire price limit method. Currently, the implementation of the highest factory price limit must be strictly enforced. We believe that these two kinds of understanding are biased and cannot achieve the expected results of rectifying governance, stabilizing prices, and ensuring the development of production. Instead, they should learn lessons and proceed from reality.