古代文论巨著《文心雕龙》为主“依经解骚”。尽管刘勰内心激赏屈骚的巨大艺术成就 ,但由于遵循“原道”、“宗经”的宗旨 ,他无法对楚辞的思想价值、审美价值、屈原的行为价值、人格魅力乃至楚辞文化的整体价值 ,作出公允的评判 ;刘勰以“雅颂”的准绳 ,试图清理屈骚中“异乎经典”的“荒诞”成份和“楚文化”因子 ,而这恰是楚辞最具光彩的东西。结果由“辨骚”滑向了“废骚”边缘。刘勰的尴尬并非孤立现象 ,传统中国楚辞学历两千年而缺乏创意、成果单薄 ,愧对高耸入云的楚辞文化 ,盖在于历代学者都囿于正统儒学价值观而管窥楚辞的缘故 Ancient literary masterpiece “Wen Xin Diao Long” mainly “according to the solution Sao.” Although Liu Xie rewards the great artistic achievements of Qusi in his heart, he can not comment on the ideological value, aesthetic value, the value of Qu Yuan’s works, charisma and even the culture of Chu Culture The whole value, and make a fair judgment. With the criterion of “Ya Chung”, Liu Xie tried to clean up the “absurd” element of “absurdity” and the “Chu culture” factor in Qu’uo, which is exactly the most glorious thing in the Song of Chu. The results from “discerning Sao” slipped to the edge of “waste show”. The embarrassment of Liu Xie is not an isolated phenomenon. The traditional Chinese Chu Ci, lack of creativity and academic achievement for two thousand years, is poorly developed and unworthy of the rise of the culture of the Songs of the South. This is due to the fact that scholars of all ages were ignorant of the values ​​of orthodox Confucianism