开栏的话典故新说,此题甚俗,所以不放弃者,取其稍稍确实耳。文物是实在东西,而我只能务虚;题目再复玄妙,真乃言之无物也。虽然这四个字,亦不免要打些折扣。“典故”诚然不差,“新说”却是未必。不过略述一己感想而已,说实话新不到哪儿去。我并非泥古守旧之辈,但是向来也不曾刻意求新。如果真能不拘一格,那么建构也好,解构也好,都是题中应有之义。也就是说,相对于一格之旧,不拘一格总是新的。我希望我能做到如此。 Open the bar, then the new allusions, this question is very custom, so do not give up, whichever is the exact ear. Relics are real things, and I can only retreat; Although these four words, it is inevitable to make some discounts. “Allusions” is not bad, “new” is not necessarily. However, a brief description of what they have just to tell the truth new not where to go. I am not old-fashioned generation, but has never been deliberately new. If you really eclectic, then the construction is good, deconstruction Ye Hao, are the questions should have meaning. In other words, relative to the old one, always eclectic new. I hope I can do that.