书法的学习过程中,碑与帖是无法绕开的学习范本,二者有着不同的特点。日后有许多的书家希望将碑与帖相结合,突破以“二王”为代表的帖学的桎梏,由此便产生了碑帖结合之说。清末学者提出碑帖结合虽然是为了政治上的“托古改制”的需要,但从根本上讲是帖学没落后对为了对其所进行的改造,但这种改造一方面在某些时候违反了自然书写的规律,另一方面则发现这种所谓的结合只是回到了起始的“原点”。 Calligraphy learning process, the monument and the post is impossible to bypass the learning model, both have different characteristics. In the future, many bookmakers hope to combine the tablet with the tablet to break through the shyness of the tablet-based tablet represented by “Wang Wang ”, which results in the combination of the tablet and the tablet. In the late Qing Dynasty scholars proposed the combination of the tablet and the essay, although it was for the sake of the political “reform of the Tookupu”, but fundamentally speaking, it was the backwardness of the essay in order to reform it. However, at this time, In violation of the law of natural writing, on the other hand, we found that this so-called combination just returned to the original “origin ”.