论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析疤痕子宫中期妊娠的两种不同引产方式的临床效果。方法:随机选取2011年5月至2013年5月在我院进行引产的60例疤痕子宫中期妊娠孕妇,根据引产方式,将孕妇随机分为观察组与对照组,每组30例。观察组采用米非司酮联合米索前列醇进行引产,对照组采用乳酸依沙吖啶注射液进行引产,观察两组孕妇的用药时间、宫缩时间及胎儿娩出时间等,对比两组孕妇的引产效果。结果:观察组成功引产率明显高于对照组,两组分别为96.7%、86.7%,观察组从用药到产生宫缩反应、宫缩反应到胎盘娩出、从用药到胎盘娩出所用时间均少于对照组,两组对比有明显差异(P<0.05)。结论:采用米非司酮联合米索前列醇进行疤痕子宫中期妊娠引产,效果优于采用乳酸依沙吖啶注射液引产,安全可靠,成功率高。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effects of two different induction methods for mid-term pregnancy with scar. Methods: From May 2011 to May 2013, 60 pregnant women with uterine scar of uterus in our hospital were randomly selected. According to induction of labor, pregnant women were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 30 cases in each group. Observation group using mifepristone combined with misoprostol for induction of labor, the control group using ethacridine lactate induction of labor, observation of the two groups of pregnant women medication time, contractions time and fetal delivery time, compared with the two groups of pregnant women Induction effect. Results: The successful induction rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group, 96.7% and 86.7% in the two groups respectively. The observation group used less time to deliver uterine contractions and uterine contractions to the placenta, The control group, there was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: The use of mifepristone combined with misoprostol for induction of labor in the second stage of uterine scar pregnancy is superior to induction of labor with ethacridine lactate injection, which is safe and reliable with high success rate.