论文部分内容阅读
本文以明代《刘子》评校本中的吴骞跋文为切入点,以证《刘子》作者非刘昼也。又透过内证法,从“本之易学”、“思辩同法”、“体系与全书结构相同”、“关键字词之相通”等四项,细论《刘子》与《文心雕龙》二书相通,尤以“势”论、“权变”论与“神”论等说法车辙一致,验《刘子》即刘勰所作,再驳吴骞所提《刘子》作者为刘处元之说。
In this paper, Wu Ming Postscript in the “Liu Zi” School Criteria in the Ming Dynasty as the starting point to prove that “Liu Zi” author is not Liu Dayu also. Through the internal law, from the “the book of easy to learn”, “ponder the same law”, “system and the structure of the book ”, “key words of the same ” and other four, Liu Zi “and” Wen Xin Diao Long “are similar to each other, especially in terms of” potential “theory,” contingency “theory and” god “theory. Refuted Wu Qian mentioned ”Liu" author Liu Yuan said.