论文部分内容阅读
南沙争端所涉国际法问题的矛盾主要集中在:中国主张的历史性依据与其他争端国主张的海洋法依据之间的法律关系问题,即中国主张的历史性依据在南沙争端中的国际法地位问题。依据国际法的先占原则,通过对中国历史性依据的梳理归纳,可以看出:中国的历史性依据与《联合国海洋法公约》的精神是内在统一的,而周边邻国对南沙诸岛拥有主权,是违反国际法上的“禁止反言”原则的,中国对南沙群岛拥有主权的历史性依据是充分而有力的,是完全符合国际法的,任何国家无法以任何借口动摇我国对南沙群岛拥有主权的法理基础。
The contradictions in the law of international law in the dispute over Nansha mainly focus on the legal relationship between the historical basis of China’s claim and the law of the sea as advocated by other dispute countries, that is, the historical basis of China’s claim in the Nansha Dispute. According to the principle of preemption under international law, we can see that the historical basis of China is in conformity with the spirit of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Neighboring neighboring countries have sovereignty over the Nansha Islands, Is a violation of the principle of “prohibiting anti-gossip” in international law. The historical basis for China’s sovereignty over the Nansha Islands is full and forceful, fully in conformity with international law and no country can under any pretext shake up China’s sovereignty over the Nansha Islands The legal basis.