论文部分内容阅读
相比自然科学,人文社会科学评价具有复杂性、模糊性等难点。目前国外的人文社会科学研究成果评价,广泛采用的方法是同行评议,但也有许多国家辅以引文分析等文献计量方法,实现了定性评价与定量评价的有机结合。从美国、英国、法国、加拿大、德国等欧美主要国家人文社会科学研究评价现状可以看出,学术评价方法,尤其是定量指标如何使用,与管理层的目的密不可分,适合的评价方法才是最好的评价方法。研究国外人文社会科学研究评价现状,对促进我国科学的评价机制的建立具有重要的现实意义。
Compared with natural sciences, humanities and social sciences evaluation has the complexity and ambiguity. At present, the evaluation methods of humanities and social sciences in foreign countries are widely used. However, there are many countries which are combined with citation analysis methods to achieve the organic combination of qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Judging from the status quo of humanities and social sciences research in major European and American countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Canada and Germany, it is clear that academic evaluation methods, especially the use of quantitative indicators, are inextricably linked with the purpose of management and suitable evaluation methods are the most Good evaluation method. It is of great practical significance to study the status quo of evaluation of humanities and social sciences in foreign countries and to promote the establishment of a scientific evaluation mechanism in our country.