论文部分内容阅读
目的比较高频振荡通气和常频通气治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭的临床疗效。方法将2010年1月-2012年9月间我院86例呼吸衰竭新生儿随机均分为两组,高频组应用高频振荡通气治疗,常频组应用常频通气治疗,对比分析两组治疗结果。结果高频组患儿治疗总有效率显著高于常频组,平均机械通气时间显著短于常频组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与常频通气机械通气治疗相比,高频振荡通气治疗新生儿呼吸衰竭效果显著,临床推广应用价值高。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and frequent ventilation on neonatal respiratory failure. Methods From January 2010 to September 2012, 86 neonates with respiratory failure in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups. The high-frequency group was treated with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. The patients in the normal-frequency group were treated with frequent-frequency ventilation. Treatment results. Results The total effective rate of high frequency group was significantly higher than that of the normal frequency group. The mean time of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter than that of the normal frequency group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the ventilated mechanical ventilation, the effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on neonatal respiratory failure is significant and the value of clinical popularization and application is high.