损害具有相互性,损害并一定意味着必然有救济。对于“受害者”的救济应遵循财富最大化原则。侵权因果关系的认定虽然复杂,但是,不能因此而放弃对于因果关系分析,恰当的做法是由立法机关和司法机关对于因果关系类型化指引法官裁判。在风险增加的社会,传统归责原则凸显其局限性,社会财富最大化原则要求风险分担的社会化。 Harmfulness of mutuality, damage and necessarily means that there must be relief. The remedy for “victim ” should follow the principle of wealth maximization. Although the determination of the causality of infringement is complicated, we can not give up the causal analysis. The appropriate approach is to guide the judge’s referendum on the type of causation by the legislature and the judiciary. In a society with increased risk, the principle of traditional imputation highlights its limitations. The principle of maximizing social wealth requires the socialization of risk-sharing.