论文部分内容阅读
目的 对护理配合在对颈动脉狭窄或闭塞数字减影血管造影(DSA)行复合手术中的应用效果进行探究分析.方法 选取颈动脉狭窄或闭塞DSA行复合手术的60 例患者为研究对象,均于2015年6月—2018年6月进行治疗,依据随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和观察组,每组30 例.对照组予以常规护理配合,观察组予以围手术期护理配合.比较两组护理效果.结果 两组生存质量评分比较,观察组的生理机能[(82.13±3.40) vs (79.52±4.41)]、精力[(65.54±2.85) vs (60.33±2.44)]、健康状况[(61.76±2.18) vs (52.16±2.93)]、社会功能[(85.18±3.21) vs (79.46±3.65)]、精神健康[(79.71±3.51) vs (69.72±2.74)]以及情感智能[(75.41±2.64) vs (68.14±3.22)]显著优于对照组(P＜0.05);两组护理服务的满意率比较,观察组(100%)明显高于对照组(73.33%)(P＜0.05).结论 对颈动脉狭窄或闭塞DSA行复合手术时配合围手术期护理效果良好,可提高患者或家属对护理服务的满意率,值得在临床中广泛应用.“,”Objective To explore the application of nursing coordination in the combined operation of carotid artery stenosis or occlusion with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Methods Patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion of DSA were selected as the subjects of this study. 60 cases were treated in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2018. The patients were divided into control group and observation group according to random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. The control group was given routine nursing care, while the observation group was given perioperative nursing cooperation. The nursing effect was compared between the two groups. Results The scores of the physiological function [(82.13±3.40) vs (79.52±4.41)], energy [(65.54±2.85) vs (60.33±2.44)] health [(61.76±2.18) vs (52.16±2.93)], social function [(85.18±3.21) vs (79.46±3.65)], mental health [(79.71±3.51) vs (69.72±2.74)] and affective intelligence [(75.41±2.64) vs (68.14±3.22)] in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P＜0.05). The satisfaction rate of the nursing service in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (100% vs 73.33%) (P＜0.05). Conclusion DSA combined operation with perioperative nursing for carotid artery stenosis or occlusion has a good effect. It can improve the satisfaction rate of patients or their families for nursing services, and it is worthy of wide application in the clinic.