陈尔泰同志的某些理论观点引起了一些争鸣,我认为是好事情。理论的成熟有赖于观点的撞击,而辩论,是最能促人思考的。必须承认,我不太同意陈尔泰同志在《试论广播电视理论研究》中的个别观点和他在其它一些文章中的某些看法;但我能理解一位研究者在坚持自己通过艰辛努力而得到的发现时那种强烈的、甚至近于偏激的态度。我认为,陈尔泰同志可以而且应该从批评中汲取某些有益的信息,这对于进一步发展和完善他的理论是必要的。但我们也要承认陈尔泰同志的理论是独出心裁的,一看便知,是作者独立思考、深入研究的产物,而不是陈陈相因、东拼西凑的结果。它从理论结构到行文风格都是有个性的。尽管许多人对是否一定需要采用目前这种艰涩的表达方式持保留态度(本人是其中之一),但毕竟个性是理论研究极其宝贵的品格,是理论创新的必要的先决条件之一。陈尔泰同志的文章是能启发人思考的。还有,陈尔泰的理论如不 Some theoretical arguments made by Comrade Chen Taai aroused some controversy. I think it is a good thing. The maturity of the theory depends on the impact of the point of view, and debate is the most people-friendly thinking. It must be admitted that I do not quite agree with Comrade Chen Taitai’s individual viewpoints in his research on the theory of radio and television broadcasting and his observations in other articles. However, I can understand that a researcher insists that he has obtained through arduous efforts The kind of strong, even near-extreme attitude. In my opinion, Comrade Chen Taitai can and should draw some useful information from criticism, which is necessary for further development and improvement of his theory. However, we must also admit that Comrade Chen Er-tai’s theory is unique and out of his own mind. It is the product of his independent thinking and in-depth study at a glance that it is not the result of Chen’s co-existence and patchwork. It has a personality from theoretical structure to style. Although many people hold reservations about whether or not they have to adopt the current arrogant way of expression (I am one of them), personality is, after all, an extremely valuable character of theoretical research and one of the necessary preconditions for theoretical innovation. Comrade Chen Ertai’s article can inspire people’s thinking. Also, Chen Er-tai’s theory is not