论文部分内容阅读
公司违规对外担保,本质上是公司的内部意思与外部表示的不一致,表现为法定代表人将违反公司章程或法律规定的担保决议对外表示,或未履行公司内部决议程序就直接作出对外担保表示,并与债权人达成了担保协议。这种违规担保已构成合同法上法定代表人越权代表的情形,应适用《合同法》第50条的公司越权行为的裁判规则,《担保法解释》第11条也对此作出了专门的规定。也就是说,从合同债权人的角度看,原则上认为法定代表人代表公司的担保行为是有效的代表行为。
The non-compliance of the guarantee by the Company is essentially the discrepancy between the internal meaning of the Company and the external representation, which means that the legal representative directly expresses the external representation in violation of the guarantee resolution stipulated in the Articles of Association or the law or directly guarantees the non-performance of the internal resolutions of the Company, And reached a guarantee agreement with creditors. This type of non-compliance guarantee has constituted the legal representative of the law on behalf of ultra vires the representative of the situation should be applicable to the “contract law” Article 50 of the company ultra vires rule of adjudication, “interpretation of guaranty law” also made specific provisions of this Article 11 . In other words, from the perspective of the contractual creditors, in principle, it is considered that the legal representative’s guarantee behavior on behalf of the company is an effective representative act.