论文部分内容阅读
运用比较研究和实证研究的方法,讨论了竞技体育仲裁中自治与它导理念的程序表达。研究结论表明,竞技仲裁不应持平兼顾二者,而应加权考虑仲裁程序的它导取向,赋予仲裁庭在案件管辖、程序管理、证据组织及裁决作出等方面的强势力量,确保竞技体育争议得到公正且高效处理;但应慎防它导性质变为仲裁庭之独裁。研究为我国建构适合中国的竞技仲裁机制提供了理论支撑。
Using the method of comparative research and empirical research, this paper discusses the procedural expression of autonomy and its guiding ideology in competitive sports arbitration. The conclusion of the study shows that competitive arbitration should not be balanced between the two, but should give weight to the direction of the arbitration procedure and give the arbitration tribunal a powerful force in case jurisdiction, procedural management, evidence organization and ruling and so on, Fair and efficient treatment; but be careful not to change the nature of the arbitration tribunal’s dictatorship. The research provides the theoretical support for our country to construct the athletic arbitration mechanism suitable for China.