论文部分内容阅读
“周文明诉文山交警案”、“重庆烟民被拘案”折射出实践中对行政裁量基准认识的误区,在现阶段行政裁量基准存在的问题均与其主张个案正义的初衷背道而驰,未能更好地实现规制行政裁量权的功能。本文认为为了实现个案正义与规制行政裁量权的目标,认识行政裁量基准现阶段存在的问题是当务之急。
“Zhou Wenming v. Wenshan traffic police ”, “the smuggling of Chongqing smuggled people ” reflects the misunderstanding of the practice of the administrative discretion benchmarks, at this stage the problems of administrative discretion benchmarks are contrary to their original intention of advocating case justice , Failed to better achieve the function of regulating administrative discretion. This paper argues that in order to achieve the goal of individual case justice and regulation of administrative discretion, it is imperative to recognize the existing problems in the administrative discretional base at this stage.