经腹和经阴道超声对剖宫产瘢痕妊娠超声不同表现分型的诊断

来源 :现代养生 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:songchanglei
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨对剖宫产后瘢痕妊娠患者采用经阴道超声检查、经腹部超声检查对不同分型的诊断情况。方法:将我院妇产科收治的64例经组织学检查和手术结果证实为剖宫产后瘢痕妊娠患者进行观察,先后采用经阴道超声检查、经腹部超声检查,观察两种检查方法的诊断准确率。结果:64例瘢痕妊娠患者中孕囊部分突入型30例,孕囊完全突入型13例,混合团块型21例。经阴道超声诊断准确率为96.88%明显高于经腹部超声检查(P<0.05);且经阴道超声检查的漏诊率、误诊率均明显低于经腹部检查(P<0.05)。结论:经阴道超声检查可以准确判定瘢痕妊娠类型,为临床治疗提供科学依据,具有较高的临床应用价值。 Objective: To investigate the diagnosis of cesarean section scar pregnancy by transvaginal ultrasonography, abdominal ultrasound examination of different types of diagnosis. Methods: 64 cases admitted to our hospital obstetrics and gynecology confirmed by histological examination and surgical results for cesarean scar pregnancy patients were observed by transvaginal ultrasound, abdominal ultrasound, the two diagnostic methods were observed Accuracy. Results: In the 64 cases of pregnancy with pregnancy, 30 cases were invaded by gestational sac, 13 cases were completely penetrated by gestational sac, and 21 cases were mixed mass. The diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography was 96.88%, which was significantly higher than that of transabdominal sonography (P <0.05). The rate of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of transvaginal sonography was significantly lower than that of transvaginal sonography (P <0.05). Conclusion: Transvaginal ultrasonography can accurately determine the type of scar pregnancy, provide a scientific basis for clinical treatment, and have high clinical value.
其他文献
目的:探讨氧化锆全瓷冠修复前牙缺失的临床效果;方法:共收集到2014年9月至2016年6月在我院接受治疗的前牙缺失患者62例,按接诊初期患者意愿随机分至观察组28例(氧化锆全冠)和