一引言如理学取其广义,清代康熙一朝的理学,不论其在朝在野,学界历来都认为以程朱为主。这当然是合乎历史实际的判断。不过,在程朱之外,同时对陆王学说能有同情了解,甚至颇多肯定者,往往被归于程朱、陆王的调和论,或者是程朱主流之下陆王一脉颓势的余绪。因此,对于清初尤其康熙一朝肯定陆王的学者,历来研究不多。~①但是,如果不为程朱和陆 I. INTRODUCTION As the science of Confucianism takes its broad sense, the Neo-Confucianism of the Qing Dynasty, no matter in North Korea, the academic circle has always considered Cheng Zhu as its main theme. This of course is in line with the historical reality. However, outside Cheng and Zhu, at the same time, there is compassion and understanding to Lu Wang’s doctrine. Even a lot of affirmations are often attributed to Cheng’s theory of harmony between Lu and Chu, thread. Therefore, for the early Qing Dynasty Kangxi, especially one who certainly Lu Wang scholars, has never been much research. ~ ① However, if not Cheng Zhu and Lu