论文部分内容阅读
南:张教授.您好!《光明日报》4月9日的《史林》版《石门夹山说——史学界再探李自成归宿问题》以及《文汇报》4月2日同样内容的报道,在再探李自成“归宿问题”的名目下“确立夹山主说”,这是关系到明史研究和旅游文化的重要问题。您作为著名的文史专家,请谈谈对此问题的看法。张:好的。这篇新闻报道讲的“学术成果”,从80年代初起我就撰文予以批评了。这篇报道企图抹煞持“通山说”者自70年代以来发现的大量史料和
South: Prof. Zhang.Hello Guangming Daily On April 9, “Shi Lin” version of “Shi Men Jia Shan said - History of the world to re-examine the issue of the return of Li Zicheng” and “Wen Wei Po” on April 2 the same content reports, In the re-examination of Li Zicheng “destination problem” under the name “to establish folder Hill master”, which is related to the Ming Dynasty research and tourism culture important issues. As a renowned expert on history and literature, please talk about the views on this issue. Zhang: Ok. The “academic achievement” of this news story has been criticized by the author since the early 1980s. This article attempts to erase a great deal of historical data