理论界对阿Q革命问题的认识一直存在着分歧。肯定者往往站在社会历史批评立场上认为阿Q革命具有一定的合法性,比如唐弢先生就从阶级论的角度指出“阿Q是从被剥削者朴素直感去欢迎革命的”[1],对革命是真心向往,他身上始终内蕴着革命的潜能。而否定者往往从阿Q的性格分析入手强调落后愚昧的阿Q根本不可能革命。本文将从文学达尔文主义的视角解读阿Q的革命性问题,以期对该问题获得一个崭新的认识。文学达尔文主义是近十多年来在西方兴起的一种文学研 There has always been disagreement among theorists about the understanding of Ah Q revolution. Affirmatives often stand on the standpoint of social and historical criticism that the revolution in Afghanistan has some legitimacy. For example, Tang Tao pointed out from the perspective of class theory that “Ah Q is from the simple and straightforward exploit to welcome the revolution.” ], Is a true yearning for the revolution, he always has the inherent potential of revolution. The negators often start from Ah Q's character analysis to emphasize backward ignorance Ah Q is impossible to revolution. This article will interpret Ah Q's revolutionary issue from the perspective of literary Darwinism in order to gain a new understanding of the issue. Literature Darwinism is a literary research that emerged in the West over the past decade or so