日前,北京市海淀区法院开庭审理了原告李国波与被告北京培黎职业学院买卖合同纠纷一案。原告李国波诉称,自2007年以来一直为北京培黎职业学院的第三食堂供应液化气。双方口头约定每月结算货款。自2012年1月4日起,北京培黎职业学院未按约付款。自2012年5月18日,李国波停止为北京培黎职业学院供应液化气。截止到2012年5月18日,北京培黎职业学院尚欠货款36 345.13元未给付。李国波多次催要未果,故诉至法院,请求法院判令北京培黎职业学院立即给付货款36 345.13元并承担本案的诉讼费用。被告北京培黎职业学院认为,李国波自2007年起至2012年5月18日供应液化气期间,—直存在缺斤少两、在液化气罐底部放置铁圈的违背诚信经营原则的行为。请求法 Recently, Haidian District Court held a trial of the dispute between the plaintiff Li Guobo and the defendant Pei Li Vocational College in the sale and purchase contract dispute. The plaintiff, Li Guobo, claimed that since 2007, it has been supplying liquefied gas to the third dining hall of Beijing Peili Vocational College. Both parties verbally agreed to settle the purchase price monthly. From January 4, 2012 onwards, Beijing Pei Vocational College did not pay the contract. Since May 18, 2012, Li Guobo stopped supplying Beijing Peili Vocational College LPG. As of May 18, 2012, Peili Vocational College still owed 36 345.13 yuan of unpaid money. Li Guobo repeatedly urging failed, so sued the court, requesting the court to order Pei Li Beijing Vocational College immediately pay 36 345.13 yuan and bear the cost of litigation. Defendant Beijing Pei Li Vocational College believes that Li Guobo from 2007 until May 18, 2012 during the supply of liquefied petroleum gas - there is a direct lack of pounds less, placed at the bottom of liquefied gas tank iron ring contrary to the principle of integrity management behavior. Request method