论文部分内容阅读
近世反孔运动的发生发展,实为明末以来学术“复古”的延续。学术变迁之所以走到“反动”孔孟这一步,一是学术发展的惯性使然,二是原始儒家神秘性褪去的结果。当儒学的内核在价值层面被否定后,“复古”的对象或用以实现“解放”的思想凭借,便只能从儒学的外部去获取,由是便有子学和西学的相继兴起。当西学丰富或更新了中国人的“复古”资源库时,反孔的力度就越显强劲。“以复古为解放”的学术变迁最终告别孔孟,步入后经学时代。
The occurrence and development of anti-hole movement in the modern world have been the continuation of the academic “retro” since the end of the Ming Dynasty. The reason why academic change has come to the “reactionary” Confucius and Mencius step is the inertia of academic development, and the second is the result of the mystery of the original Confucianism. When Confucianism’s kernel is denied at the value level, the object of “retro” or the thought to realize “liberation ” can only be obtained from the outside of Confucianism, from having children and learning One after another rise. When western learning enriches or updates the Chinese “retro” repositories, the anti-Confucianism is even stronger. “To the liberation of retro ” academic change eventually bid farewell to Confucius and Mencius, entered the post-Confucian class era.