论文部分内容阅读
目前在我国引渡或遣返外逃贪腐人员的过程中,死刑不引渡一直是困扰反腐国际合作的最大程序障碍之一。由于我国贪污受贿犯罪中的死刑适用在相当长时间内继续存在,充分有效不判处死刑的量刑承诺就成为化解该障碍的主要途径。我国的反腐司法格局、引渡现状决定了我们要正视死刑适用的客观性。无论是人权与主权的博弈、制度是否违宪方面,还是适用法律是否平等方面,量刑承诺制度均存在诸多争议和不完善之处,但并不足以否定量刑承诺制度的合理性和必要性。通过借鉴美国、英国和日本等国量刑承诺制度的现状,在我国量刑承诺制度有效存续的前提下,我们应从透明化、制度化等方面对量刑承诺的流转程序、作出程序、承诺内容等方面加以完善,增强量刑承诺的有效性和权威性。
At present, in the process of extradition or repatriation of corrupt officials in China, the non-extradition of death penalty has always been one of the biggest procedural obstacles that plague international cooperation against corruption. Since the application of the death penalty in the crime of corruption and bribery in our country persists for a long time, the full and effective sentencing commitment of not sentenceing to death has become the main way to resolve this obstacle. The pattern of China’s anti-corruption judiciary and the status quo of extradition determine that we should address the objectivity of the application of the death penalty. Whether it is the game between human rights and sovereignty, whether the system is unconstitutional, or whether the applicable law is equal, there are many disputes and imperfections in the sentencing commitment system, but it is not enough to deny the rationality and necessity of the sentencing commitment system. By drawing lessons from the status quo of the sentencing commitment system in the United States, Britain and Japan, under the premise of the effective existence of the sentencing commitment system in our country, we should make the transfer procedure, the procedure and the commitment content of sentencing commitment transparent and systematic Improve and enhance the effectiveness and authority of the sentencing commitment.