Weisfeldt等报告,与在公共场所发生者比较,在家发生的心脏骤停中,心室颤动(简称室颤)较少,即使是有人目察的情况下。作者推测这是由于年龄与兼患疾病的关系。发生的地点可能是疾病严重性的一个替代指标。此外,在家发生的病人转复(AED)的预后不如在公共场所发生者。作者在结论中提出,AEDs较宜应用于发生于公共场所的心脏骤停者。为了提高猝 Weisfeldt et al. Reported fewer ventricular fibrillation (VF) events at home during cardiac arrest than those occurring in public places, even in the presence of someone. The authors speculate that this is due to age and disease-related. The place of occurrence may be a surrogate indicator of the severity of the disease. In addition, patient-generated (AED) outcomes at home are less predictable than those occurring in a public facility. In conclusion, the authors suggest that AEDs should be better applied to cardiac arrests that occur in public places. To increase the chance of quenching